I have to say write off the bat that I got really
irritated reading the article by Rodgers et al.
To me it seemed to be full of generalisations and opinion dressed up as
fact. For example, it claims that the 21st
century learner has short attention span because of multi tasking. Short compared to what? What evidence is there that learners from previous
generations had a longer attention span?
My son and daughter (like countless millions of children of the current
generation read all 7 of the Harry Potter books. My generation didn’t show that sort of
commitment to reading! The writers also state that today’s learners prefer
acronyms instead of text. That’s like
saying journalists prefer shorthand. It also states that we process more information in
24 hours than the average person 500 years ago would process in a
lifetime. I have absolutely no idea what
that means.
I also disagree fundamentally with the statement that
in the past the primary challenge facing students was to “absorb a vast array
of specific information” I do not know
what institutions the authors attended but that was not my experience 30 years
ago.
But the real reason I didn’t like this article was
that in its conclusions it focusses on the changes need in course design (how
to learn) rather than considering if new technology should change what we
expect students to show they can do. And that is the big question, which cannot be answered at faculty
level. That’s institutional and
governmental.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHello Andrew, I agree that this article seems to have a great deal of unwarranted assertions, many of which seem quite simplistic and, at best, anecdotal. It's also a little annoying to read about 'collaborative tasks' as though they are something so new. Having worked in primary education and English teaching where collaboration is often the norm,I'm wondering where the authors have been. I suspect that the inhabit a more transmission-based, lecture-focused world. But how long has socioconstructivism been around? I found the part about acronyms more than a little patronising and felt like asking 'so what?' All generations create new language and technology facilitates this, but to extrapolate from this that this means that that 21st century learners learn in fundamentally different ways is a stretch too far.
ReplyDelete